Monday, May 7, 2018
Fair Dealing Week 2018 Recap
On February 28, 2018, the University of Alberta’s Copyright Office hosted a day-long event in celebration of Fair Dealing Week, an initiative by the Association of Research Libraries (ARL). More background information about the event is available here. The event featured four speakers from various disciplines, who talked about the impact and importance of Fair Dealing as a user right in the Canadian Copyright Act.
“Fair Dealing on Trial”
Speaker: Lisa Di Valentinohttp://dx.doi.org/10.7939/R3TH8C24W
Lisa Di Valentino travelled all the way from the University of Massachusetts Amherst to discuss the importance of Fair Dealing in education, and the facts and outcome of the recent decision in the Access Copyright v York University case. She assured the crowd that even though she has now moved to the United States and works within the Fair Use system, “wherever I go, I bring Fair Dealing with me. It’s forever in my heart.”
This discussion was followed by a spirited Q and A, which emphasized the need for users and creators alike to come together to voice their copyright needs and concerns as we enter the review period of the Canadian Copyright Act.
http://dx.doi.org/10.7939/R3PV6BN2K
The director of the University of Alberta’s Copyright Office, Adrian Sheppard, delivered a talk on the necessity of having, as well as possible issues and areas for improvement when using, institutional Fair Dealing Guidelines.
Adrian stated that guidelines can always be improved, and reviewing them (when the time is right) makes good sense. Adrian emphasized that the guidelines were not intended as a substitute for a fair dealing analysis, but rather were intended to offer a quick and easy guide to determine fairness across a broad range of likely cases in a particular context (such as at a post-secondary institution). Guidelines are only intended as a shortcut; fairness remains the standard. He outlined certain situations in which the AUCC fair dealing guidelines may not always yield a fair outcome (such as when applying a 10% or one chapter guideline to an anthology of complete plays), questioned whether fiction and non-fiction, or scholarly and popular works, should be dealt with in the same way under the guidelines, and explored the difficulty of trying to develop a simple, easy to apply, set of guidelines that would appropriately address 100% of copying done on behalf of an institution. If there cannot be a perfect set of guidelines, how good is good enough?
http://dx.doi.org/10.7939/R3B853Z2C
Chris George, president of an Ottawa public relations firm and a registered lobbyist for the Council of Minister of Education, Canada (CMEC) Copyright Consortium, travelled from Ottawa to showcase the conversation about copyright currently underway on Parliament Hill, and to highlight what is and what isn’t being discussed. Chris suggested that it’s those acting on behalf of the creators (such as big academic publishers, or the Access Copyright collective) who are making the most noise, seeking changes to the Copyright Act that limit, or even eliminate, the educational exception in the fair dealing provision, which could effectively reverse 10 years of legal decisions, and cancel out existing fair dealing guidelines. Chris stated the importance of helping MPs understand that fair dealing is not a blank cheque and the fair dealing guidelines set reasonable conditions, and students across Canada greatly benefit from the access to educational content allowed by this provision..
Michael McNally finished the day with a simple call-to-action: get involved! As the 2017/2018 5-year statutory review of the Copyright Act commences, Michael stressed the importance (and rising trend) of making your voice heard through public engagement, as the government actively wants to listen to people, and not just corporations and other established voices. Copyright affects us all in that we are both creators and users, and as much as creators are incentivised to participate, users must also contribute their voices, as copyright is as much a user right as it is a creator’s right.
There is real value in participating in this review and consultation, and it’s fun to engage in intellectual battle! Start writing to your MP’s now; even if you have only one strong argument to contribute, or if you simply agree with other prominent voices in the Canadian copyright landscape, it’s important to make your opinion heard.
“Fair Dealing Guidelines Forum”
Speaker: Adrian Sheppardhttp://dx.doi.org/10.7939/R3PV6BN2K
The director of the University of Alberta’s Copyright Office, Adrian Sheppard, delivered a talk on the necessity of having, as well as possible issues and areas for improvement when using, institutional Fair Dealing Guidelines.
Adrian stated that guidelines can always be improved, and reviewing them (when the time is right) makes good sense. Adrian emphasized that the guidelines were not intended as a substitute for a fair dealing analysis, but rather were intended to offer a quick and easy guide to determine fairness across a broad range of likely cases in a particular context (such as at a post-secondary institution). Guidelines are only intended as a shortcut; fairness remains the standard. He outlined certain situations in which the AUCC fair dealing guidelines may not always yield a fair outcome (such as when applying a 10% or one chapter guideline to an anthology of complete plays), questioned whether fiction and non-fiction, or scholarly and popular works, should be dealt with in the same way under the guidelines, and explored the difficulty of trying to develop a simple, easy to apply, set of guidelines that would appropriately address 100% of copying done on behalf of an institution. If there cannot be a perfect set of guidelines, how good is good enough?
“Today’s Fair Dealing Discussion in Federal Parliament”
Speaker: Chris Georgehttp://dx.doi.org/10.7939/R3B853Z2C
Chris George, president of an Ottawa public relations firm and a registered lobbyist for the Council of Minister of Education, Canada (CMEC) Copyright Consortium, travelled from Ottawa to showcase the conversation about copyright currently underway on Parliament Hill, and to highlight what is and what isn’t being discussed. Chris suggested that it’s those acting on behalf of the creators (such as big academic publishers, or the Access Copyright collective) who are making the most noise, seeking changes to the Copyright Act that limit, or even eliminate, the educational exception in the fair dealing provision, which could effectively reverse 10 years of legal decisions, and cancel out existing fair dealing guidelines. Chris stated the importance of helping MPs understand that fair dealing is not a blank cheque and the fair dealing guidelines set reasonable conditions, and students across Canada greatly benefit from the access to educational content allowed by this provision..
“How You Can Contribute to the 2017/2018 Canadian Copyright Act Review”
Speaker: Michael McNallyMichael McNally finished the day with a simple call-to-action: get involved! As the 2017/2018 5-year statutory review of the Copyright Act commences, Michael stressed the importance (and rising trend) of making your voice heard through public engagement, as the government actively wants to listen to people, and not just corporations and other established voices. Copyright affects us all in that we are both creators and users, and as much as creators are incentivised to participate, users must also contribute their voices, as copyright is as much a user right as it is a creator’s right.
There is real value in participating in this review and consultation, and it’s fun to engage in intellectual battle! Start writing to your MP’s now; even if you have only one strong argument to contribute, or if you simply agree with other prominent voices in the Canadian copyright landscape, it’s important to make your opinion heard.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
No comments :
Post a Comment